Galbraith views poverty’s existence in modern
Though social services are very important, the priorities in this country clearly lie elsewhere. Much more money goes into the military than anywhere else. We spend more time and money trying to fix the problems of other nations than we spend protecting our own citizens. We also have a problem with “pork,” the wasting of tax dollars on unnecessary and costly projects.
Even if more money was spent on the poor however, results are not guaranteed to occur as Galbraith predicted. Providing everyone with a living wage, regardless of whether or not they are capable of holding a job, is not a very good motivation for keeping a job. Why would someone work for what they could have for free? Funneling money into schools in poor neighborhoods is a good idea, but is also not guaranteed to solve the problems of poverty. How exactly would the funds be used? Would they go towards teacher salaries or after school programs? While Galbraith is correct in pointing out that poverty can partially be blamed on the fact that people simply do not notice or care (24), there is more to the problem than that. People simply do not agree on the best way to address the problem. People look to the wasteful government spending and are skeptical of new taxes, as well they should be. Our country needs however, to again bring poverty to the forefront of the national consciousness so that these issues may be openly debated and fresh ideas may emerge for the betterment of society.
1 comment:
I like your call for knowledge and debate at the end. A question might be can anything be garuanteed? We put more money than the rest of the world into our military, but does that guarantee we will be "safe"? We pay into retirement and pension plans, does that gaurantee we will get them (Enron, Owens Corning, others)? Poverty is a difficult dillema.
Post a Comment